⭐ 9.96/10 Checkatrade · 114+ Reviews
📞 07359 872594
Extensions & Structural2 min read

Glazing for London Home Extensions in 2025: Bifold Doors, Sliding Doors, Roof Lights, Aluminium vs Timber, U-values, Costs

GLAZING IS THE MOST VISIBLE AND MOST IMPACTFUL SPECIFICATION DECISION IN A LONDON HOME EXTENSION. THE CHOICE OF DOOR TYPE (BIFOLD, SLIDING, FRENCH DOORS, OR A SINGLE DOOR), THE MATERIAL (ALUMINIUM, TIMBER, STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE), THE PERFORMANCE (DOUBLE OR TRIPLE GLAZED, U-VALUE, SOLAR CONTROL), AND THE SIZE OF THE OPENING ALL DETERMINE THE VISUAL CHARACTER, THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE, AND THE LIVABILITY OF THE NEW EXTENSION. IN LONDON IN 2025, THE DOMINANT CHOICE FOR REAR EXTENSIONS IS ALUMINIUM-FRAMED BIFOLD OR SLIDING DOORS — BUT THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR EVERY PROJECT. IN CONSERVATION AREAS AND LISTED BUILDINGS, TIMBER SASH WINDOWS OR STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE WINDOWS MAY BE REQUIRED OR PREFERRED. IN EXTENSION DESIGNS WHERE MAXIMUM GLASS AREA IS THE PRIORITY, CORNER GLASS, FULL-HEIGHT FRAMELESS GLAZING, OR ROOF LANTERNS ARE THE APPROACH. AND FROM A PERFORMANCE PERSPECTIVE, TRIPLE GLAZED UNITS ARE INCREASINGLY SPECIFIED IN LONDON EXTENSIONS TO REDUCE HEAT LOSS AND IMPROVE THERMAL COMFORT NEAR LARGE GLASS AREAS. This guide covers: BIFOLD DOORS vs SLIDING DOORS (ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES, WHEN TO CHOOSE EACH); ALUMINIUM vs TIMBER vs STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE FRAMES; TRIPLE vs DOUBLE GLAZING (U-VALUES, SOLAR CONTROL G-VALUE, PART L); ROOF LIGHTS AND ROOF LANTERNS; CONSERVATION AREA AND LISTED BUILDING GLAZING RULES; SECONDARY GLAZING; AND GLAZING COSTS IN LONDON IN 2025.

Key Takeaways

  • Bifold vs sliding doors, aluminium vs timber vs Crittal, and triple vs double glazing for London extensions 2025: BIFOLD DOORS: panels fold accordion-style, entire opening clears when fully open; panels project 200-300mm into space when open; 3-pane 2.1m to 5-pane 5.0m typical range; Part Q (PAS24 security) required; low threshold (10-20mm) available from premium manufacturers (Schuco, Origin); SLIDING DOORS (LIFT-AND-SLIDE): panels slide behind each other; only width of one panel used when open (advantage in tight spaces); lift-and-slide (Schuco ASS 70.HI, Reynaers CP 130): exceptional weather seal — panel lifts and compresses against frame gasket; Vitrocsa: 12mm sightlines (minimal frame); CORNER SLIDING (no corner post): structural steel required overhead; dramatic floor-to-ceiling corner glass; ALUMINIUM (MOST POPULAR): inherently strong (thin sightlines), thermally broken (polyamide thermal break — specify for external use), low maintenance (powder coat 25+ years), wide colour range (anthracite grey RAL 7016 most popular in London 2025); BS EN 12206-1 powder coat standard; premium: Schuco, Reynaers, Vitrocsa; mid-range: Origin (UK-made), Smart Architectural; TIMBER: better inherent thermal performance; appropriate for conservation areas and listed buildings; maintenance required (paint/stain every 5-10 years); Accoya (acetylated — 25-year guarantee) preferred; CRITTAL STEEL: finest sightlines (25-35mm vs 60-90mm aluminium); industrial aesthetic; thermally poor unless thermally broken; high maintenance (repaint every 5-10 years, treat rust immediately); TRIPLE GLAZING: U-value approximately 0.8-1.2 W/m²K (vs 1.4-1.6 double); 20-30% more expensive; heavier panels; warmer glass surface; improved acoustics; SOLAR CONTROL: G-value 0.25-0.40 (rejects 60-75% solar gain) — specify for south/west facing glazed extensions; PART L: maximum approximately 1.4-1.6 W/m²K overall for new windows and doors; FENSA/CERTASS registered contractors self-certify compliance.
  • Roof lights, roof lanterns, conservation area rules, secondary glazing, and glazing costs for London 2025: FLAT ROOFLIGHTS (FLAT ROOF EXTENSIONS): bring natural light deep into London terrace; Korniche, Vision AGI, Velux flat roof windows; triple glazed preferred; self-cleaning glass (Pilkington Activ, Saint-Gobain Bioclean) recommended for maintenance; minimum 150mm upstand/kerb; top-hung opening sections for Part F ventilation; ROOF LANTERNS: glazed pyramid on flat roof; very popular in London kitchen extensions; Korniche, Atlas, Leka Systems, Clement; triple glazed; self-cleaning glass essential (access difficult); electric opening section (remote-controlled, solar-controlled, rain-sensor) strongly recommended for south-facing — prevents summer overheating; VELUX (PITCHED ROOF): EDW flashing for slate, EDL for low-pitch; minimum 15° pitch; CONSERVATION AREA: rear extensions less strictly regulated than front; UPVC generally refused anywhere visible; aluminium may be accepted on rear but timber or steel preferred in some CA contexts; like-for-like timber sash replacement is PD; LISTED BUILDINGS: LBC required for all glazing changes; timber or original material; aluminium almost never approved; SECONDARY GLAZING: internal additional frame behind existing window; no planning permission required; Selectaglaze UK market leader; standard U-value improvement + acoustic performance (Rw 40-48 dB with 150-200mm air gap); £350-£700 standard, £600-£1,200 acoustic per window; COSTS (SUPPLY): bifold 3-pane 2.1m: £1,800-£4,500; 4-pane 3.0m: £2,500-£6,500; lift-and-slide 2-pane 2.4m: £2,000-£5,000; timber bifold: 30-50% above aluminium; Crittal steel: £600-£1,200/m²; flat rooflight (600×600 to 1500×1500): £800-£2,500; roof lantern (1.5m×1.5m): £1,500-£4,000; Velux roof window: £400-£900; installation per opening: £500-£2,000 additional.

Bifold doors vs sliding doors, aluminium vs timber vs Crittal steel frames, and triple vs double glazing for London home extensions in 2025

Bifold doors vs sliding doors, aluminium vs timber vs steel Crittal-style frames, and triple glazed vs double glazed specification for London home extensions in 2025: BIFOLD DOORS vs SLIDING DOORS: THE MAIN CHOICE IN LONDON EXTENSIONS: BIFOLD DOORS: panels fold accordion-style and stack to one or both sides of the opening; advantages: the ENTIRE OPENING AREA CAN BE CLEARED when fully open (no fixed side panels, unlike most sliding systems); maximum connection between inside and outside on a warm day; CAN SPAN LARGE OPENINGS (typically 1.5m-7.0m, with 3-4 panel bi-folds the most popular for London terraces); disadvantages: REQUIRE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE to swing open (the folded panels project approximately 200-300mm in front of the wall plane when open); the fold-and-stack mechanism creates a WIDE STACK of panels when open (three panels stacking: approximately 450-600mm wide); LOW-THRESHOLD OPTION (10-20mm sill, suitable for wheeled or walking access) available from premium manufacturers (Schuco, Origin, Smart Architectural Aluminium); POPULAR BIFOLD CONFIGURATIONS FOR LONDON EXTENSIONS: 3-pane bifold: 2.1-3.0m wide; 4-pane bifold: 2.8-4.0m; 5-pane bifold: 3.5-5.0m; SECURITY: look for PAS24 ENHANCED SECURITY rating (the specification that satisfies Part Q of the Building Regulations — RESISTANCE TO ATTACK); all new external doors in dwellings must meet Part Q; SLIDING DOORS (SLIDING-FOLDING OR LIFT-AND-SLIDE): panels slide horizontally on a track, with one or two panels fixed (non-opening) and one or two panels opening; a LIFT-AND-SLIDE SYSTEM (used by Schuco, Reynaers, Vitrocsa) lifts the panel slightly off the track before sliding — provides a very tight weather seal when closed (much better than older rolling-track sliding systems); advantages: PANELS STACK BEHIND EACH OTHER (only the width of one panel is used when open, rather than the accordion stack of a bifold); in a narrow side passage or courtyard, this is a significant advantage; HIGHER WEATHER PERFORMANCE when closed (lift-and-slide) compared to bifolds; WIDER MAXIMUM SPANS (a Schuco ASS 70.HI lift-and-slide can span up to 10m+ as a multi-panel system); THINNER SIGHTLINES on premium systems (Vitrocsa: 12mm sightline — minimal frame visual interruption); MINIMAL THRESHOLD (3-8mm on premium lift-and-slide systems); disadvantages: IN A STANDARD 2-PANEL CONFIGURATION, 50% OF THE OPENING IS ALWAYS GLASS (one panel is fixed); in a corner or wrap-around extension, a CORNER SLIDING DOOR (where two sliding panels meet at the corner with no corner post) creates a dramatic floor-to-ceiling corner glass effect; CORNER SLIDING DOORS: Schuco, Reynaers, and Origin all offer corner sliding systems; the corner mullion is eliminated when the doors slide open; a significant structural steel frame above is required to carry the loads across the corner opening; ALUMINIUM vs TIMBER vs STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE: ALUMINIUM FRAMES (MOST POPULAR FOR LONDON EXTENSIONS): POWDER-COATED ALUMINIUM is the dominant material for bifold and sliding doors in London extensions in 2025; ADVANTAGES: INHERENTLY STRONG (thin sightlines possible because aluminium is stronger than timber for equivalent cross-section); THERMAL BREAK (a polyamide thermal break runs through the section to prevent cold bridging through the aluminium — look for THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINIUM for external use); LOW MAINTENANCE (powder coat lasts 25+ years with correct RAL colour; repaint is possible); WIDE COLOUR RANGE (RAL powder coat — anthracite grey RAL 7016, black RAL 9005, white RAL 9010, and custom colours); DURABILITY (aluminium does not rot, warp, or twist — critical in London's damp climate); POWDER COAT STANDARD: BS EN 12206-1:2004 (aluminium powder coating standard); MANUFACTURERS AND BRANDS: PREMIUM: Schuco (German — benchmark quality; ADS 65 HD, ADS 70 HD bifold; ASS 70.HI sliding); Reynaers (Belgian — CS 86-HI, CP 130 sliding; popular in London); Vitrocsa (Swiss — minimal sightlines); GOOD MID-RANGE: Origin (UK-made — O-90 bifold, OB-49 sliding); Smart Architectural Aluminium (UK — Visoglide sliding, Alitherm bifold); TIMBER FRAMES: ADVANTAGES: BETTER THERMAL PERFORMANCE (timber has lower conductivity than aluminium — timber frames have better inherent U-values without requiring a thermal break); TRADITIONAL APPEARANCE (appropriate for conservation areas and listed buildings where aluminium would be refused); CARBON BENEFIT (timber is a carbon sink — lower embodied carbon than aluminium); DISADVANTAGES: MAINTENANCE REQUIRED (timber must be painted or stained every 5-10 years and must be protected from standing water and prolonged damp); HIGHER COST for equivalent performance to aluminium; WARPING RISK in timber if not maintained and if the joinery is not properly sealed end-grain at all times; TIMBER SPECIES: ACCOYA (acetylated pine — highly durable, 25-year guarantee, low movement); HARDWOOD (e.g. Iroko, Sapele — durable, appropriate for conservation area replacement); ENGINEERED TIMBER (glulam or engineered wood cores with timber face — more stable than solid timber); STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE FRAMES: CRITTAL (the original company — Crittal Windows, established 1884) produces steel W20 range windows and doors; also many competitors (Winson, Concept Windows, Mondrian); HOT-ROLLED STEEL SECTIONS provide the FINEST SIGHTLINES POSSIBLE (typically 25-35mm, compared with 60-90mm for aluminium bifolds); the INDUSTRIAL, WAREHOUSE-STYLE AESTHETIC is extremely popular in London industrial-loft conversions and arts-and-crafts style extensions; ADVANTAGES: finest sightlines; authentic industrial character; longevity (decades with correct maintenance); DISADVANTAGES: THERMAL PERFORMANCE IS POOR (steel has very high thermal conductivity; thermal break versions exist but sightlines become wider — some of the advantage over aluminium is lost; standard non-thermally-broken Crittal-style: U-value approximately 3.0-5.0 W/m²K — far above the Part L limit); therefore: Crittal-style steel MUST be paired with a HIGH-PERFORMANCE LOW-E DOUBLE GLAZED UNIT to achieve acceptable overall unit U-values; or use in a LISTED BUILDING where Part L requirements have a relaxation; thermally broken Crittal: approximately 1.5-2.5 W/m²K; HIGH MAINTENANCE (steel must be painted every 5-10 years and any rust treated immediately); WEIGHT (steel is heavier than aluminium — requires heavier ironmongery and installation); TRIPLE vs DOUBLE GLAZING: DOUBLE GLAZING (TWO PANES, ARGON-FILLED CAVITY): centre-pane U-value approximately 1.0-1.4 W/m²K (low-E coating); TRIPLE GLAZING (THREE PANES, TWO ARGON-FILLED CAVITIES): centre-pane U-value approximately 0.5-0.8 W/m²K (two low-E coatings); overall unit U-value (including frame) approximately 0.8-1.2 W/m²K (depending on frame); TRIPLE GLAZING ADVANTAGES: significantly lower heat loss through the glass (important for a heavily glazed rear extension — a 4m wide bifold in a London extension is approximately 4×2.1 = 8.4m² of glass; reducing the U-value from 1.4 to 0.8 saves approximately 50 W per °C of temperature difference — meaningful in winter); IMPROVED ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE (triple glazing reduces sound transmission); warmer glass surface temperature (improves comfort near large glass areas — less cold radiation); TRIPLE GLAZING DISADVANTAGES: higher cost (approximately 20-30% above double glazing); heavier (glass panels are heavier — impacts hardware specification); slightly reduced light transmission (each additional pane and coating reduces solar heat gain and visible light transmittance slightly — G-value typically 0.35-0.50 for triple vs 0.55-0.70 for double); SOLAR CONTROL GLASS: for south- or west-facing glazed extensions (rear extensions in a north-south orientated terrace): SOLAR CONTROL LOW-E COATINGS (e.g. Saint-Gobain Planitherm ULTRA N, Pilkington K Glass) reduce the SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT (G-value, also called SHGC) — reducing summer overheating; a solar control unit might have G-value approximately 0.25-0.40 (rejecting 60-75% of incident solar energy while admitting light); PART L (BUILDING REGULATIONS THERMAL PERFORMANCE): maximum U-value for new doors/windows in extensions: approximately 1.4-1.6 W/m²K overall (frame + glass) for windows and doors; as part of a whole extension energy package; DOUBLE GLAZED LOW-E ARGON-FILLED UNITS IN THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINIUM FRAMES typically achieve approximately 1.4-1.6 W/m²K overall (minimum Part L compliance); TRIPLE GLAZED UNITS IN THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINIUM FRAMES achieve approximately 0.8-1.2 W/m²K (exceeds Part L); FENSA (FENESTRATION SELF-ASSESSMENT SCHEME) / CERTASS REGISTRATION: glazing contractors registered with FENSA or CERTASS can self-certify that replacement windows and doors comply with Part L and Part Q — they issue a compliance certificate; NON-REGISTERED CONTRACTORS: must use a Building Regulations application for the glazing work.

Roof lights and roof lanterns, conservation area glazing rules, secondary glazing, and glazing costs for London home extensions in 2025

Roof lights, roof lanterns, conservation area glazing rules, secondary glazing, and glazing costs for London home extensions in 2025: ROOF LIGHTS AND ROOF LANTERNS: ROOF LIGHTS (FLAT ROOF LIGHTS): FLAT ROOFLIGHTS installed into a flat roof extension are one of the most effective ways to BRING NATURAL LIGHT DEEP INTO A LONDON TERRACE (which may be dark at the rear because neighbouring properties block low-angle light from the sides and rear); SPECIFICATION: ALUMINIUM-FRAMED SELF-CLEANING TRIPLE GLAZED UNITS: the best specification for a permanent flat rooflight in a London extension; self-cleaning glass (Pilkington Activ, Saint-Gobain Bioclean — photocatalytic and hydrophilic coating) reduces maintenance frequency (rain naturally washes off loosened dirt); triple glazed: U-value approximately 1.0-1.4 W/m²K; MANUFACTURERS: Korniche (aluminium, slim section, UK-made — extremely popular in London extensions), Vision AGI (structural glass — minimal sightlines, suitable for frameless or near-frameless installations), Fixed Flat Rooflights (various UK manufacturers), Velux Flat Roof Windows (modular, easy to specify, widely stocked by builders merchants); MINIMUM KERB HEIGHT: 150mm above the finished flat roof surface (prevents water ingress at low falls and maintains the waterproof membrane connection); MINIMUM OPENING AREA RULE (BUILDING REGULATIONS PART L AND PART F): the aggregate area of rooflights and windows in a room affects: (1) the room's ability to have adequate natural ventilation (Part F — top-hung opening sections or opening lights needed); (2) the thermal performance of the extension (more glass = more heat loss — a fully glazed roof in a flat roof extension will perform significantly worse thermally than a partially glazed roof unless triple glazed; Part L compliance should be assessed as a whole); VELUX ROOF WINDOWS (IN A PITCHED ROOF): as noted in the roofing guide: installed flush with the slope of a pitched roof; EDW flashing kit for natural slate; EDL for low-pitch applications; minimum pitch 15°; ROOF LANTERNS: a ROOF LANTERN is a glazed pyramid-like structure raised above the flat roof surface, admitting light from all four sides and the apex; very popular in London kitchen extensions as the feature element of an open-plan kitchen-diner; ALUMINIUM-FRAMED ROOF LANTERNS: Korniche Roof Lantern, Atlas Roof Lantern, Leka Systems Roof Lantern, Clement Conservation Roof Lanterns; sizes: typically 1.0m × 1.5m to 3.0m × 4.0m or larger; SPECIFICATION POINTS: THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINIUM FRAME; TRIPLE GLAZED GLASS PANELS (reduce heat loss through the large glazed area); SELF-CLEANING GLASS (Pilkington Activ or equivalent — essential for roof lanterns as cleaning a roof lantern requires specialist access); UPSTAND: the roof lantern sits on an UPSTAND (a kerb above the flat roof) — minimum 150mm high; the upstand is built as part of the flat roof structure and is waterproofed and flashed by the roofer before the lantern is installed; OPENING SECTIONS: some roof lanterns include an ELECTRIC OPENING SECTION (a remote-controlled ventilation panel that opens the lantern to allow hot air to escape in summer — solar-controlled and rain-sensor shutting); highly recommended for SOUTH-FACING kitchen extensions where the roof lantern admits significant solar gain in summer; CONSERVATION AREA GLAZING RULES: in a CONSERVATION AREA, glazing choices are scrutinised by the LPA'S CONSERVATION OFFICER; GENERAL RULES: FRONT ELEVATIONS: glazing visible from the street is most strictly controlled; UPVC windows are generally refused (the appearance differs from original timber or steel); ALUMINIUM (slimline, dark colour) may be accepted in some conservation areas but is generally less preferred than timber; TIMBER SASH WINDOWS (on original openings): like-for-like replacement is normally PD; changing from timber to aluminium requires planning; REAR EXTENSIONS (LEAST VISIBLE): glazing on rear extensions in conservation areas is less strictly regulated; contemporary aluminium bifold or sliding doors on rear extensions are typically acceptable where the extension design is approved; SOME CONSERVATION AREAS (PARTICULARLY LISTED BUILDING CONSERVATION AREAS): the conservation officer may prefer TIMBER or STEEL CRITTAL-STYLE frames, consistent with the character of the original building; LISTED BUILDINGS: LISTED BUILDING CONSENT for any glazing change; the conservation officer and Historic England will guide appropriate choices; typically timber or original material required; aluminium or UPVC is almost never accepted on a listed building; SECONDARY GLAZING: SECONDARY GLAZING is an INNER FRAME fitted behind the existing window (on the internal face of the reveal) — it is separate from the original window and creates an additional air gap; applicable where the ORIGINAL WINDOW CANNOT BE REPLACED (conservation area; listed building; windows that are original fabric); advantages: significantly improves U-value of the combined system (original + secondary glazing); ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE is excellent with a 150-200mm air gap (Rw up to 40-48 dB as noted in the windows guide); no planning permission required (it is internal and does not change the external appearance); SELECTAGLAZE is the leading UK manufacturer; GLAZING COSTS IN LONDON IN 2025: ALUMINIUM BIFOLD DOORS: 3-pane, 2.1m wide: approximately £1,800-£4,500 supply; 4-pane, 3.0m wide: approximately £2,500-£6,500 supply; 5-pane, 4.0m wide: approximately £3,500-£9,000 supply; installation approximately £500-£1,500 additional; ALUMINIUM LIFT-AND-SLIDE SLIDING DOOR: 2-pane, 2.4m wide (1 sliding, 1 fixed): approximately £2,000-£5,000 supply; TIMBER BIFOLD DOORS: approximately 30-50% more than aluminium equivalent; CRITTAL-STYLE STEEL DOORS AND WINDOWS (NON-THERMALLY BROKEN): approximately £600-£1,200/m² supply (expensive per m² — sightlines are fine but cost per area is high); ALUMINIUM FLAT ROOFLIGHT (600×600 to 1500×1500mm, triple glazed): approximately £800-£2,500 supply; ALUMINIUM ROOF LANTERN (1.5m × 1.5m, triple glazed, self-cleaning glass): approximately £1,500-£4,000 supply; larger lanterns (3m × 2m): approximately £3,000-£7,000+ supply; VELUX ROOF WINDOW (PITCHED ROOF, 78×140cm including flashings): approximately £400-£900 supply; SECONDARY GLAZING (SELECTAGLAZE, PER WINDOW, SUPPLY + INSTALL): approximately £350-£700 standard; approximately £600-£1,200 acoustic; INSTALLATION ALLOWANCE FOR GLAZING IN AN EXTENSION: typically £500-£2,000 per opening depending on size, height, and lintel work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I specify bifold doors or sliding doors for my London rear extension in 2025?
BIFOLD DOORS vs SLIDING DOORS FOR A LONDON REAR EXTENSION IN 2025: THE KEY DECISION FACTORS: (1) DO YOU WANT THE FULL OPENING CLEAR? BIFOLD WINS: when fully open, bifold doors fold back and the ENTIRE OPENING IS UNOBSTRUCTED (except for the door post at one or both ends); in a standard sliding door system, at least one panel is always fixed — 50% of the opening is always glass; (2) DO YOU HAVE SPACE FOR THE FOLDED PANELS? SLIDING WINS IN TIGHT SPACES: bifold panels project 200-300mm into the internal space when open (the accordion stack of folded panels); in a narrow galley extension or where the opening is adjacent to a kitchen island with minimal clearance, the folded panel stack is intrusive; a sliding door slides away with minimal projection into the space; (3) WEATHER PERFORMANCE (SEALED WHEN CLOSED): LIFT-AND-SLIDE WINS: a premium lift-and-slide aluminium door (Schuco ASS 70.HI, Reynaers CS 86-HI) provides an exceptionally tight weather seal when closed — the panel lifts slightly and compresses against the frame gasket; bifold doors have more visible sightlines between adjacent panels and typically slightly more air leakage at the fold junctions; for a NORTH-FACING rear extension in London, where the doors are less often fully open and weather performance matters more, the lift-and-slide is preferable; (4) AESTHETICS: bifolds are more traditional for London kitchen extensions; SLIMLINE LIFT-AND-SLIDE SYSTEMS have minimal visible frame (particularly Vitrocsa — 12mm sightline); for a CONTEMPORARY, MINIMALIST EXTENSION, the lift-and-slide may be visually preferable; (5) COST: aluminium lift-and-slide systems are typically 10-30% MORE EXPENSIVE than equivalent bifolds at the same performance level; RECOMMENDATION: for a 2.4-4.0m rear opening in a London terrace, where the primary use is indoor-outdoor connection in summer and weather seal in winter: BIFOLD IS THE POPULAR CHOICE and works very well; for a corner opening, large span, or a contemporary design prioritising minimal frame, LIFT-AND-SLIDE (or corner sliding) is the premium choice.

Important Note

This guide is for general information only. Building regulations, planning rules, and legal requirements change regularly and vary by local authority. Always seek professional advice specific to your project and location. RCB Design & Build offers free initial consultations — book your free survey.

Ready to Discuss Your Project?

Free site survey. No obligation. Covering all Greater London & M25.

📞 Call now💬 WhatsAppFree Quote